Elon Musk expands his long -term enemy with Openain Sam Altman by bringing third party: Apple

Apple has forbidden Musk’s claims in his statement that the App Store « is designed to be fair and free from biased ».

« We have thousands of applications through curated lists used by charts, algorithmic recommendations and experts selected by experts, » said the spokesman The statement will be shared with news points. « Our goal is to provide users with a safe discovery and valuable opportunities for developers that work many to cooperate on the visibility of the app in rapidly developed categories. »

X users and Musk’s own Grok Chatbot, had quickly pointed out that Musk’s demand was weakened by Deepseek and the confused applications that had previously taken the top spot of the Apple App Store.

The topic may be more related to Apple’s permanent contract with Openai’s chatgpt. During the middle of 2010, chatgpt was built on Siri and system-wide writing tools on Opt-in-based. Siri asks for permission before submitting the queries; Openai account is not required; And Apple has said that it intends to support extra AI service providers over time.

Still, integration gives ChatgPT, the first-party placement for hundreds of millions of Apple devices, which may make it difficult to overcome the attention of users like Musk XAI. With Google Weaving the gemini ai Android’s mobile AI market could increasingly be shaped by default integrations, which could make it difficult for competitors like XAI.

The Openai and Apple store seemed to get under a billion skin when it was announced when Musk took X to complain: « It is clearly nonsense that Apple is not smart enough to make its own AI, but somehow can make sure that Openai protects your safety and privacy! »

Musk continued to threaten to prevent all Apple devices from companies if the Openai technology was integrated into iOS.

Questions related to Apple’s competition law

Apple is currently in the midst of several other competitive battles.

Apple’s App Store is one of the few key platforms for distribution of the application. Anyone who gets visibility is actually a huge proportion of new users, which has been controversial to some of its competitors.

In the United States, Apple’s App Store practices have been reviewed since 2020, when epic games challenged the company Fortnite From the App Store that passed its payment system to avoid a 30%commission. The Federal Court of Appeal refused recently to suspend their long -term battle with epic games that forcing Apple to allow developers to guide users to external payment options.

Last year, the Ministry of Justice left the landmark competition laws that accused Apple for the monopoly of the smartphone market, claiming that its App Store policy prevents new developers and suppress innovation. Apple has denied claims by saying that its practices promote innovation and consumer choice. June to the US District Court New Jersey denied Apple’s movement reject the lawsuit.

In a separate case received by the Ministry of Justice from Google from $ 15 billion to $ 20 billion a year, search with a giant could be in jeopardy after the federal judge announced in August last year that Google illegally maintains monopoly in the Internet, partly through exclusive contracts with companies like Apple. A shop that made Google’s default default search machine could interfere with the judge’s currently weighing drugs JPMORGA analysts warn The fact that in the worst case, the decision can cost Apple about $ 12.5 billion a year.