‘I got A+on Iim Ahmedabad with ChatgPT’: Student Message Sparks Discussion

What do you get when you mix the Elite B-school mission, a curious MBA student and a chatbot that never sleeps?

Apparently – a+.

Iim Ahmedabad student Yugantar Gupta only broken the Hornet’s nest in LinkedIn by admitting that he used a chatgpt to write a report that received a top class with one of India’s toughest plants. But before you turn your eyes, this was not a typical AI short icon.

The Gupta showed a cosmetics project, the Gupta did not turn to Google. He went to the mall. From lifestyle to forest-freeness, he pulled buyers, eavesdropping on buying behavior, priestly salesmen with the questions of the fake girlfriend, and records all the granular details. Back on the campus, he fed this raw data on Chatgpt and formulated AI’s output into a strict, original report – one that stunned his professors.

« In a world where chatgpt can do better secondary research than you, the only edge is what it can’t get – a living experience, » he wrote. His mail went viral.

The applause followed. « Oh can accelerate, but human curiosity and initiative are invaluable, » said one user. But so does the setback. « You miss the joy of writing, but you wrote this message? » Your whip the other. Teachers became a deeper criticism: « How did professors fairly evaluate work when AI is allowed but invisible? »

The Gupta clarified that detection tools such as a turnitic can easily connect the content of inoriginal, AI. What he left, he demanded, was built on man based on research. Oh didn’t replace the work – it refined it.

The bigger question is now in every classroom and business corridor: if tools like chatgpt are here to stay here, what is the real trouble? True creativity? The real value?