The National Security Council adds Gmail to its list of bad solutions

The Washington Post that the members of the White House National Security Council have used personal Gmail accounts to carry out a government business. National Security Advisor Michael Waltz and Senior Assistant to both of him used their own accounts to discuss sensitive information with colleagues, according to PostReview and interviews with civil servants who spoke with the newspaper anonymously.

Email is not the best approach to sharing information designed to maintain private. This covers sensitive data for persons such as social security numbers or passwords, much less confidential or classified government documents. He just has too many potential ways to make a bad actor access information that doesn’t have to be available. Government departments usually use e -mail services instead of relying on e -mail user services. The Federal Government also has its own internal communications systems with additional security layers, which makes it even more viable that current employees are so cavalier that they are dealing with important information.

« Unless you use GPG, an email is not encrypted from end to end and the content of the message can be captured and read at many points, including on Google’s electronic servers, » Eva Galperin, Cybersecurity Director at Electronic Border Foundation, told the Electron Foundation Foundation Foundation at The Electronic Frontier Foundation in front of The Electronic Frontier Foundition PostS

In addition, there are provisions requiring certain official government communications to be preserved and archived. Using a personal account can allow some messages to sneak through the cracks, accidentally or intentionally.

This last case of dubious use of software from the executive branch follows the discovery that several high -ranking national security leaders have used a signal to discuss planned hostilities in Yemen, and then added a journalist from The Atlantic Ocean To the group chat. And while the signal is a more secure option than a public email client, even the encrypted message platform can be operated as its own team last week.

As with last week’s signal debate, there have been no consequences for all federal employees who take risky data confidentiality. NSC spokesman Brian Hughes told Post He did not see evidence of waltz using a personal account for government correspondence.

This article originally appeared at Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/cybersecurity/national-cecity-council-adds-ds-list-of-bad-decism 222648613.html?sr

Politics & Government,site|engadget,provider_name|Engadget,region|US,language|en-US,author_name|Anna Washenko

#National #Security #Council #adds #Gmail #list #bad #solutions

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse e-mail ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *