The new corner office is at home

Nowadays, a new « parking space » battle has been created – not over the office batch, but who gets to work remotely and how often. When companies are struggling with return offices and hybrid schedules, decisions about who works, where there is a flash point coming. The study confirms what many business executives already know: inequality in isolation is increasing. High -income, highly educated workers are much more likely to have remote alternatives, while most others are not. Work that costs about $ 30,000 is rare; For those who earn more than $ 200,000, more than 30% offers partially or full -time flexibility. Many leaders with whom we speak in our executive education programs mention justice (or its intervention) as a significant concern for work. Workers who are required to come to the office can weaken commitment and morality. In this new world, the work is not uniform – it tailors. But with the adjustment, the challenge maintains justice in still tailored work arrangements. How should organizations intervene?

Usually there is no shortage of injustice in the workplace. Everyone knows that people in the same organization often deserve different wages. Other benefits – such as health insurance or holiday insurance – are also unevenly distributed. So why who works remotely so worrying? And what can leaders do to solve it?

Studies show who are more likely to accept adverse decisions if they see fairness in the decision -making process. In practice, this is difficult because justice depends on many factors: (1) explained clearly the causes of the decision, (2), whether it was consistently applied (3) whether people have enough time and resources to adapt (4), whether their contribution has been requested and considered, and are treated with valuably and with respect. Although most of these circumstances are met, one or two unfair elements can strongly form general perceptions of justice.

In terms of teleworking, saying only that job can remotely not enough to justify Why Someone gets the benefit of it. So here are three key factors to ensure customized hybrid work arrangements get wider support:

1. Find out how and why a new work structure (remote control, hybrid or office) add value – for everyone

Uneven treatment becomes more legal when it is considered a tool for a larger goal. Leaders must communicate clearly that teleworking is a productivity strategy. This means that it is specific to explain how working at home allows for better concentration, faster performance or higher quality output-and How these benefits help the team or the organization work better.

Too often, home work arrangements have been developed in terms of individual preference or comfort. Instead, they must be justified by the creation of value. If teleworking does not clearly increase better results, it should not be allowed. But when it happens, employees and remote and personalized to understand why.

2. To take employees in the formatting of hybrid policies

People are more likely to accept unequal arrangements when they have a sound in the process. Instead of setting up-down policies from top-down policy, companies should include employees-ACROS roles, functions and work discussions about what kind of hybrid work should look like.

Discussions can be studies, listening sessions, functional teams, or even informal feedback loops. The gold standard is employees to know that their views were seriously considered. When employees see that their perspectives are reflected in political decisions, they can directly see that their contribution was taken into account, leading to their decisions as fair. The bigger challenge is to show people that their contribution was seriously taken into account, even though it was not reflected in policy decisions. When this is the case, leaders must give reasonable explanations and in a reasonable voice.

3. Invest in an office experience to improve-to

For those who need to be on the spot, hybrid work may seem like a raw trade. Therefore, organizations need to go beyond surface level benefits (free snacks do not cut it) and focus on creating significant improvements in the office experience.

This could include better planned facilities for collaboration, clearer schedules for a common presence, or streamlined workflows that reduce friction and frustration. The goal is to make office work more genuinely productive and appropriate. Such changes are significant for employees not only essentially but also symbolically. In the end, it conveys to employees that they are treated with dignity and respect.

Hybrid work is here to stay. But its long-term success does not only depend on technology or politics, and the fairness of its design and implementation process. By explaining the decisions, clearly taking the contribution of employees seriously and improving the job on the spot leaders can build hybrid systems that seem less to the gap and more than a common company.

Fortune Global Forum Return to 26 – 27 October 2025 in Riyadh. CEOs and global leaders meet only for dynamic, invited only the future of the company. Apply for an invitation.